Two Provers in Isolation
نویسندگان
چکیده
We revisit the Two-Prover Bit Commitment Scheme of BenOr, Goldwasser, Kilian and Wigderson [BGKW88]. First, we introduce Two-Prover Bit Commitment Schemes similar to theirs and demonstrate that although they are classically secure using their proof technique, we also show that if the provers are allowed to share quantum entanglement, they are able to successfully break the binding condition. Secondly, we translate this result in a purely classical setting and investigate the possibility of using this Bit Commitment scheme in applications. We observe that the security claim of [BGKW88] based on the assumption that the provers cannot communicate is not a sufficient criteria to obtain soundness. We develop a set of conditions, called isolation, that must be satisfied by any third party interacting with the provers to guarantee the binding property of the Bit Commitment.
منابع مشابه
Spatial Isolation Implies Zero Knowledge Even in a Quantum World
Zero knowledge plays a central role in cryptography and complexity. The seminal work of Ben-Or et al. (STOC 1988) shows that zero knowledge can be achieved unconditionally for any language in NEXP, as long as one is willing to make a suitable physical assumption: if the provers are spatially isolated, then they can be assumed to be playing independent strategies. Quantum mechanics, however, tel...
متن کاملPolynomial-Space Approximation of No-Signaling Provers
In two-prover one-round interactive proof systems, no-signaling provers are those who are allowed to use arbitrary strategies, not limited to local operations, as long as their strategies cannot be used for communication between them. Study of multi-prover interactive proof systems with no-signaling provers is motivated by study of those with provers sharing quantum states. The relation between...
متن کاملInteractive proofs with competing teams of no-signaling provers
This paper studies a generalization of multi-prover interactive proofs in which a verifier interacts with two competing teams of provers: one team attempts to convince the verifier to accept while the other attempts to convince the verifier to reject. Each team consists of two provers who jointly implement a no-signaling strategy. No-signaling strategies are a curious class of joint strategy th...
متن کاملA Matter of Trust: Skeptical Communication Between Coq and External Provers (Detailed Description)
Most theorem provers are either hard to trust because they are large programs or hard to use due to a lack of automation. They are thus used by two di erent communities depending on the property one needs most: the ability to prove quickly a large amount of theorems or a high level of safety. My thesis studies a communication between these di erent kinds of tools, by asking for proof witnesses ...
متن کاملMulti-prover Interactive Proofs: Unsound Foundations
Several Multi-Prover Interactive Proofs (MIPs) found in the literature contain proofs of soundness that are lacking. This was first observed [1] in which a notion of Prover isolation is defined to partly address the issue. Furthermore, some existing Zero-Knowledge MIPs suffer from a catastrophic flaw: they outright allow the Provers to communicate via the Verifier. Consequently, their soundness...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011